Abstract:
Mechanical perturbation with a compliant surface decreases the knee flexion angles.
Abstract
Introduction: Performing physical activities on a compliant surface alters joint kinematics and increases joints stiffness. However, the effect of compliant surface on joint kinematics after ACL-rupture is yet unknown.
Aim: To compare the effects of mechanical perturbation training with a compliant surface to manual perturbation training on joint kinematics after ACL-rupture.
Methods: Sixteen level I/II athletes with ACL-rupture participated in this preliminary study. Eight patients received mechanical perturbation with compliant surface (Mechanical) and 8 patients received manual perturbation training (Manual). Patients completed standard gait analysis before (Pre) and after (Post) training.
Results: Significant group-by-time interactions were found for knee flexion angle at initial contact (IC) and peak knee flexion (PKF) (p<0.004), with manual group significantly increased knee flexion angle at IC and PKF (p<0.03). Main effects of group were found for hip flexion angle at IC (Manual:34.34+3.51?, Mechanical:27.68+4.08?, p?=?0.011), hip rotation angle at PKE (Manual:-3.40+4.78?, Mechanical:5.43+4.78?, p?0.0001), and knee adduction angle at PKE (Manual:-2.00+2.23?, Mechanical:0.55+2.23?, p?=?0.039). Main effects of time were found for hip adduction angle at PKE (Pre:6.98+4.48?, Post:8.41+4.91?, p?=?0.04), knee adduction angle at IC (Pre:-2.90+3.50?, Post:-0.62+2.58?, p?=?0.03), ankle adduction angle at IC (Pre:2.16+3.54, Post:3.8+3.68, p?=?0.008), and ankle flexion angle at PKF (Pre:-4.55+2.77?, Post:-2.39+3.48?, p?=?0.01).
Discussion: Training on a compliant surface induces different effects on joint kinematics compared to manual perturbation training after ACL-rupture. Manual perturbation improved hip alignment and increased knee flexion angles, while mechanical training decreased knee flexion angles throughout the stance phase. Administering training on a